Details on Lawyer for the petitioners Raila Odinga and Martha Karua Julie Soweto live demonstration to supreme court on staging and alteration of form 34As.
The Case Of Gacharaigo
From a form in Muranga Ms. Julie Soweto cites suspicious looking tallies on a form 34As.
Further, she demonstrates the evidence of a trail left behind by the person the petitioners believe to have been responsible for altering the form 34As – a Mr Jose Camargo. According to the petitioners.

It is this foreigner who according to the petitioners tampered with Kenya’s elections. It is Raila’s submission that it is this Venezuelan individual who decided who is President-Elect following Kenya’s 2022 Presidential Election.
Using two form 34As one from Nyeri Town and another from Chesikaki Mt Elgon, Bungoma both which had the same serial number. This means that the same KIEMs kit had been used hours apart at least 1,000 kilometers apart.
Further Evidence Of Staging and Tampering Of Form 34As
Ms Julie Soweto then goes on to cite that at least 11,000 forms in the IEBC portal bear similar discrepancies. Further, all these forms were transmitted from one IP address, yet each KIEMs kit was to have a unique IP address and as presented by the commission, tied to a particular polling station.
Julie Soweto: All the forms that are on the IEBC portal are in black and white at what point were they altered from JPEG to PGF? The fingerprints of those who interfered with the system are still there#SupremePetition pic.twitter.com/KMKwlzts6J
— Nation Africa (@NationAfrica) September 2, 2022
She also questioned why the forms in the portal are in black and white yet they are to be colored jpeg photos? At what point did the images become pdfs?
Objection by Ruto Lawyers Ruled Out
Court denies Ruto team an opportunity to file response which termed the presentation by Ms Soweto as “new material”. The CJ Martha Koome pointed out that the 1st petitioner was merely responding to a question by the bench. She also affirmed the court’s wisdom by stating that the bench had the capacity to make a decision on what had been presented.